Skip to content

The federal Supplemental Poverty Measure (SPM), which improves on the official poverty measure (see note), shows that:

  • 1 in 5 Californians (20.6%) struggle to afford basic necessities, up from 14.9% under the official poverty measure.
  • Nearly one-quarter of children (23.8%) live in families struggling to get by — a larger share than for adults regardless of which poverty measure is used.
  • Seniors are nearly twice as likely to lack adequate resources under this more accurate measure.

  • 1 in 4 black Californians (25.1%) and 3 in 10 Latinos (30.4%) are struggling financially based on the SPM (see chart below).
  • Black Californians and Latinos are more likely to face economic hardship than whites, regardless of how poverty is measured.
  • The share of Latinos struggling to get by is 9 percentage points higher based on this better measure of hardship.

  • One-third of Latino children (33.2%) live in poverty based on the SPM, compared to 29.7% under the official measure (see chart below).
  • Over one-quarter of black children (25.7%) live in poverty based on the SPM. Although this is unacceptably high, it is nearly 8 percentage points lower than the official poverty rate (33.5%) due to the impact of public supports like CalFresh food assistance and housing assistance.
  • Latino and black children are more than twice as likely as white children to live in families that are struggling to get by.

  • The share of seniors struggling to make ends meet is substantially higher under the SPM (see chart below).
  • Nearly one-third of Latino seniors (32.4%) and nearly one-quarter of other seniors of color (23.7%) struggle financially.
  • Seniors of color are more likely than white seniors to live in poverty regardless of which measure of hardship is used.

The SPM is a better measure of economic hardship than the official poverty measure because it:
1) Better accounts for differences in the cost of living by establishing different poverty lines within each metropolitan area and for all non-metropolitan areas within a state combined for people who rent their home, own their home with a mortgage, or own their home without a mortgage;
2) Factors in a broader array of resources that people use to make ends meet by adding to people’s incomes the value of non-cash benefits, such as food and housing assistance, as well as personal income tax credits, including the Earned Income Tax Credit; and
3) More accurately estimates people’s disposable income by subtracting from income the cost of basic expenses, including work-related expenses, such as child care, and out-of-pocket medical expenses.
Three years of data were pooled together to increase the reliability of the estimates for demographic groups based on small samples, such as seniors of color.

Stay in the know.

Join our email list!